8
The Cabinet considered report FP/453/03/16 by the Executive Director for Corporate and Customer Services, presented by the Cabinet Member for Finance, Housing and Planning, which presented information to enable it to recommend to Full Council for approval the revenue budget for 2017/18 and the capital programme for 2017/18.
The report asked Cabinet to note the funding sources for 2017/18; the revenue budget for each portfolio; the proposal in respect of the council tax rate for 2017/18 and the capital programme for 2017/18, and to approve the related recommendations set out in section 2 of report FP/453/03/16.
The Cabinet was asked to note the Medium Term Resources Strategy (MTRS) from 2018/19 to 2019/20, which was informed by the best information available regarding future funding and demand, whilst noting the risks and mitigations approach as outlined in the report.
Finally, the Cabinet was asked to note that, whilst the Council was able to present a balanced budget for 2017/18, this did not assume full delivery of savings and there was not yet a balanced position for 2018/19 and 2019/20.
Cabinet Members provided the following information in response to questions by Councillors Buckley, Danvers, Henderson and Mackrory:
- Referring to paragraph 3.6 of the report, the Cabinet Member for Finance, Housing and Planning made the distinction between the Council's decision to accept a social care precept of 2% and that to freeze the traditional elements of the Council Tax (ie those at the Council's discretion). He accepted that this still represented increased financial outlay for Essex residents. He emphasised his concern for the effect of this on them whilst noting that, in his view, the proposed increase was reasonable. Referring to the fact that the greatest proportion of Council Tax was paid by those residing in lower banded properties, which constituted the majority of housing, the Cabinet Member expressed personal support for the issue of property revaluation.
- Although financial savings had been made, and would continue to be made, the continued delivery of excellent services would be achieved by reshaping services and identifying means to generate additional revenue. New ways of working would undoubtedly mean a requirement for fewer staff, and there had been a 10% reduction in the Council's workforce over the past four years, with the majority having left on a voluntary basis. Efforts would be made to avoid job losses whilst concentrating on the need to achieve greater efficiencies for Council Tax payers.
- The Council had been clear that the Government should ensure proper funding for social care, as it did for health services, and had made representations to this effect whenever possible. An adult conversation with the Government on the issue would be welcome. It was, however, also important to constantly examine services to ensure that they continued to be appropriate and took account of tax payers' needs, reshaping them as necessary.
- The Council had no plans to hold a referendum arising from a decision to set a budget associated with a Council Tax increase beyond the limit set by the Government, along the lines of that planned by Surrey County Council. Indications were that the cost of a similar referendum for Essex would be in the region of £1m.
- The Cabinet Member for Finance, Housing and Planning emphasised that the capital programme was well-managed, albeit that delays sometimes occurred for reasons beyond the Council's control.
- The Cabinet Member for Education and Lifelong Learning advised that the introduction of the Fair Funding Formula was likely to benefit up to 70% of schools in Essex, with no adverse impact on the remainder. The proposals were currently subject to consultation, but he would arrange
for publication of the outcome relevant to Essex once final figures were available.
Resolved:
Revenue and Capital Budget
That the following be recommended to full Council for approval:
- The net revenue budget requirement to be set at £851.2 million (m) (net cost of services less general government grants) for 2017/18.
- The net cost of services to be set at £911.2m for 2017/18.
- The total council tax funding requirement be set at £597.5m for 2017/18.
- A 3% social care precept be levied but with no further changes to council tax, therefore the Essex County Council element of the council tax for charge for a Band D property in 2017/18 will be £1,163.70. A full list of bands is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council Tax Band
|
2016/17
£
|
2017/18
£
|
Band A
|
753.42
|
775.80
|
Band B
|
878.99
|
905.10
|
Band C
|
1,004.56
|
1,034.40
|
Band D
|
1,130.13
|
1,163.70
|
Band E
|
1,381.27
|
1,422.30
|
Band F
|
1,632.41
|
1,680.90
|
Band G
|
1,883.55
|
1,939.50
|
Band H
|
2,260.26
|
2,327.40
|
- A proposed total schools budget of £545.9m for 2017/18, as set out on page 13 of Appendix A to report FP/453/03/16, which will be funded by the Dedicated Schools Grant.
- The underlying balance on the General Balance be set at £59.2m as at 1 April 2017.
- The capital payments guideline be set at £263.4m for 2017/18 and that the Executive Director for Corporate and Customer Services , in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Finance, Housing and Planning, be authorised to make adjustments to the phasing or payments between years (should that be necessary) as the capital programme is finalised, and to report any impact on the Prudential Indicators at the subsequent quarterly review to Cabinet in July 2017. Any requests to change the prudential borrowing would be brought back before full Council.
- Agree a modest change to the fees and charges policy whereby default annual price increases will be set at the movement in the Retail Prices Index (all items) as at September of the preceding year where permissible, rather than the Consumer Prices Index, as currently stated in the policy (approved in November 2014).
That the following be agreed:
- That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Housing and Planning, in consultation with the Executive Director for Corporate and Customer Services, may make adjustments to the recommendations to full Council upon receipt of:
- the final tax base and forecast business rates receipts for 2017/18 from the billing authorities (due by 31st January 2017);
- the final capital grant in respect of education from the Department for Education (DfE) expected March 2017; and
- the final settlement from Government expected early February 2017.
- That the Executive Director for Corporate and Customer Services (Section 151 Officer) statement on the robustness of the estimates and reserves be noted.
Prudential Indicators, Treasury Management Strategy and Minimum Revenue Provision for Debt Repayment Policy
That the following be recommended to full Council for approval:
- Approval of the 2017/18 - 2019/20 Prudential Indicators and limits, together with updated limits for 2016/17 as set out in Appendix B to report FP/453/03/16.
- Approval of the Treasury Management Strategy for 2017/18 as set out in Appendix B to report FP/453/03/16.
- Approval of the policy for making a prudent level of revenue provision for the repayment of debt (the Minimum Revenue Provision policy, as set out in Appendix B to report FP/453/03/16).
Pay Policy Statement
That the following be recommended to full Council for approval:
- Adoption of the Pay Policy Statement for 2917/18 as set out in Appendix C to report FP/453/03/16.
That the following be noted:
- The medium term (2018/19 - 2019/20) revenue issues facing the Council as set out in Appendix A to report FP/453/03/16, highlighting the funding sources and implications. The position is based upon the best intelligence available today including future funding, price
rises and demand; but there is inherent uncertainty given the changes in national and local circumstances.
- The recommendations in report FP/453/03/16 present a balanced budget for 2017/18. The Council's plans for 2018/19 and 2019/20 are not sufficiently firm as to allow for a balanced budget to be set. Further opportunities for improving income and funding, plus greater efficiencies will need to be secured in the medium term, which will be achieved by a focus on outcomes-based commissioning.
- The above figures are based on Band D tax base of 513,471 properties.